Kerry: ‘One of Most Successful Environmental Agreements in History’ is Actually Driving Climate Change

Now that Secretary of State John Kerry has the Paris Agreement on climate change under his belt, he has set his sights on amending the 1987 Montreal Protocol that phased out “ozone-depleting substances” (ODS) such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons to help close the ozone hole over the Antarctic. In doing so, Kerry appears to be giving credence to the classic Ronald Reagan maxim, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”

Speaking at the Palace Hotel in New York City Thursday, Kerry praised the 1987 Montreal Protocol agreement, which he said he personally helped steer through the Senate. He echoed the words of the former secretary general of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, that the Montreal Protocol was “[p]erhaps the single most successful international agreement to date.”

The Montreal Protocol… was passed in order to address the deeply troubling hole that existed in the ozone layer. And it actually has become one of the most successful environmental agreements in history. Virtually all parties met their obligations under the accord. And nearly 100 of the most ozone-depleting substances have been completely phased out. As a result, the hole in the ozone layer is shrinking and on its way to full repair.

But in a classic good news/bad news formulation, Kerry revealed (admitted?) that “one of the most successful environmental agreements in history” was inadvertently responsible for a “almost as much pollution as 300 coal-fired power plants” and some of the replacements for substances banned in Montreal are “thousands of times more potent” than other factors in climate change:

And we can all recall how we kept talking about the growing hole in the ozone, the dangers that it presented to us, and many people doubted whether or not we’d have the capacity to be able to do something about it. Well, we did do something about it. We proved that human beings have the ability to be able to make a difference on the environment, if we, when we, make the choices that are available to us. And now – but then, that’s the good news. The bad news is that the substances banned by the Montreal Protocol have been replaced by substances that cause a different kind of danger. HFCs may be safer for the ozone, but they are exceptionally potent drivers of climate change itself, often thousands of times more potent than, for example, carbon dioxide. So today, the growing use of HFCs [hydrofluorocarbons] in everyday items, like refrigerators or air conditioners, in inhalers, is responsible for an entire gigaton of CO2-equivalent pollution annually. It’s extraordinary.

When Kerry previously addressed the same issue in Vienna in July, he said that because of the Montreal Protocol “we’ve created jobs, citizens have better health, we live a higher quality of life, and we have begun to meet our generational responsibility to the future, to our children and grandchildren, to leave them with a world that is sustainable.” Yet in the same speech he warned that climate change, exacerbated by the unintended consequences of that very agreement, will have apocalyptic consequences:

[T]hink about the cost of trying to move a whole nation if you’re an island state in the Pacific – think about the costs that will come as cyclones and tornadoes and every form of fire, weather, flood begins to more prominently present itself as a yearly, annual, monthly challenge to nation after nation.

Related Content