House Approves $644 Billion for Defense

Bloomberg reports:

The U.S. House of Representatives, by a vote of 397-27, authorized $644 billion for defense spending in fiscal 2008.
The measure includes $483 billion for regular Defense Department programs plus $20 billion for the nuclear weapons programs at the Energy Department as well as military-related programs within the Justice and Homeland Security Departments.
It also includes $141 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, marking the first time since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that this war funding is covered within the regular defense budget.
This money is separate from the $124 billion in supplemental funding for this fiscal year now before Congress. That bill is stalled over President George W. Bush’s objections to language proposing a withdrawal of troops from Iraq. The authorization measure passed today has no mention of withdrawal or of another proposal — setting benchmarks to measure progress in Iraq.

Congressional Quarterly reporter Josh Rogin adds:

The House also retreated, in the face of White House veto threats, by rejecting attempts to restrict the president’s authority in dealing with Iran.

One amendment that was rejected, 202-216, offered by New Jersey Democrat Robert E. Andrews, would have prevented the Pentagon from using any Iraq or Afghanistan funding to plan military operations in Iran.
The House also rejected, 136-288, a proposal by Peter A. DeFazio, D-Ore., and three other lawmakers that would have required congressional authorization before any military action could be taken against Iran.

It seems odd that an amendment requiring Congressional authorization for military action against Iran would have less support than an amendment preventing the Pentagon from planning for such action. If a member of Congress is worried that the Bush administration is preparing for a possible strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities–which the administration would be unbelievably foolish not to do–then wouldn’t that representative also want to require that the Bush administration seek Congressional approval before putting those plans into action? Is there something I’m missing here? Also included in the Bloomberg piece: the House approved $4 billion for MRAP vehicles, which is on top of the $3 billion set aside for MRAP vehicles in the still unresolved supplemental, and the Army wants to spend a total of $19 billion on MRAP through 2009. The Marine Corps, too, has made clear its desire to switch over its entire fleet of Humvees to MRAP as soon as possible. At the beginning of the year, the program was expected to deliver roughly 4,000 vehicles at a cost of some $2 billion. Then it was 7,700 MRAPs for $8 billion. And now were talking about what, maybe $25 billion when all is said and done? The size of the MRAP program is growing at a remarkable rate.

Related Content