Ninth Circuit rules for Verizon in class action over recorded phone calls

Published



SAN FRANCISCO (Legal Newsline) – A federal appeals court has ruled that because the named plaintiff in a class action lawsuit against Verizon failed to carry his burden of demonstrating a likelihood of irreparable harm, the district court properly denied his request for a preliminary injunction.

John Lofton sued Verizon Wireless LLC after the company’s debt collector recorded two phone calls without his consent, according to an opinion filed Dec. 5 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The appeal was argued Nov. 18.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.