The revelation that Democratic appropriations kingpins may face an ethics investigation of their campaign donations moves Republicans closer to gaining a corruption issue in 2010.
Republicans know well how lapses in ethical standards can sink a political party. They lost control of the House in the 2006 midterm election, succumbing in part to accusations from Democrats that the GOP had produced a “culture of corruption” in which lobbyists showered gifts on lawmakers in exchange for government contracts and other legislative favors.
Recommended Stories
The Democratic chairman and senior Republican on the House ethics committee dropped their political bomb Thursday night, announcing that the panel is reviewing the practice of lawmakers steering money and contracts to favored companies, and then receiving campaign contributions in return for the “earmarks.”
The announcement came months after the Justice Department began a criminal investigation of the matter and a repetition of House votes on Republican motions — all of them defeated — calling for an ethics probe of lawmakers who engage in what is often called a “pay-to-play” system for funneling federal dollars to select companies and projects.
The review could turn into a full-blown ethics investigation later, with the potential for scathing reports that could become campaign fodder.
Democratic Reps. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, Pete Visclosky of Indiana and Jim Moran of Virginia, all members of the money-dispensing House Appropriations Committee, received significant campaign donations from lobbyists from a defunct firm, PMA, and its clients — companies that got money for pet projects.
Their risk is that Republicans will be able to depict them as the personification of corruption, much in the way Democrats portrayed former Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas and ex-GOP Reps. Bob Ney of Ohio and Duke Cunningham of California going into the 2006 election. Ney and Cunningham both ended up being sentenced to federal prison.
Republicans can take credit for smoking out Thursday’s announcement of the ethics inquiry. Eight times this year, Republicans kept the PMA issue in the public eye — forcing votes on a resolution demanding an ethics investigation of lawmakers tied to the lobbying firm.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried to blunt the Republican offensive by arranging a lecture to party members by the former top Democrat on the House ethics committee, Rep. Howard Berman of California.
In desperation, the Democrats countered with their own resolution — instructing the ethics committee to declare whether it was investigating the link between earmarks and campaign donations. That’s just what the committee did Thursday.
The Democratic majority leader, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, said in a statement how pleased he was that the ethics committee “responded so quickly” to the Democrats’ call for a public statement.
“As I have stated consistently, the committee can and must review substantive ethics allegations that are raised in the public sphere, including those made about the PMA Group,” he said.
He never mentioned the leadership’s work to block the Republican attempts to get the investigation started.
