Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz has good discussion of why his employer is currently trying to offload Newsweek:
Almost exactly one year ago, Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham was telling me that deliberately cutting its circulation in half — from what had been a high of 3.1 million to 1.5 million — would not destroy the money-losing magazine. He and his staff had decided to go upscale. The question, he said, involved advertisers: “Will they accept a more affluent Newsweek demographic, given that they’ve been acculturated all these years to think of us as a mass vehicle?” The answer is now apparent.
Part of the strategy was a radical redesign. I was not a fan of it, and neither, I can tell you, were a number of people who work there. By lumping a bunch of columnists together, playing up opinion and analysis in what [Newsweek editor Jon] Meacham called the “reported narrative” and the “argued essay,” he transformed the magazine into an odd hybrid. In practice, it did seem to turn Newsweek into a version of the New Republic or the Economist.
Sometimes the cover stories were politically or culturally sharp, sometimes not, but they increasingly seemed to lean left. I lost track of the number of Barack and Michelle covers, one of them based on a Meacham interview with the president. And a couple of its top political writers double as MSNBC commentators.
Part of the strategy was a radical redesign. I was not a fan of it, and neither, I can tell you, were a number of people who work there. By lumping a bunch of columnists together, playing up opinion and analysis in what [Newsweek editor Jon] Meacham called the “reported narrative” and the “argued essay,” he transformed the magazine into an odd hybrid. In practice, it did seem to turn Newsweek into a version of the New Republic or the Economist.
Sometimes the cover stories were politically or culturally sharp, sometimes not, but they increasingly seemed to lean left. I lost track of the number of Barack and Michelle covers, one of them based on a Meacham interview with the president. And a couple of its top political writers double as MSNBC commentators.
Kudos to Kurtz for admitting the obvious — Newsweek was leaning editorially too far left. Meacham publicly said he wanted to emulate the Economist but what he ended up with was a sort of dumbed down New Republic. Kurtz doesn’t mention it, but this was best exemplified by the flap over a December 2008 cover story, “The Biblical Case for Gay Marriage.” The piece was an error-riddled affront to Christians as well as a political jeremiad that ran counter to what a majority of Americans believe. And Meacham doubled down in his defense of the piece.
Recommended Stories
Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.