Ethics Panel Prejudges Rangel Case?

Published January 29, 2009 6:16pm ET



House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently chose to reconstitute the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct (the Ethics Committe) with new members. That means that the panel investigating Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel has to start from scratch. While one of the new members — Vermont’s Peter Welch — recognizes that having accepted donations from Rangel creates the appearance of a conflict of interest (or an actual conflict of interest), one of his colleagues sees no problem:

An aide to Peter Welch of Vermont says he will return funds he received from Rangel, D-N.Y., who is under investigation by the ethics panel for alleged improprieties with his fundraising and personal finances. But G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina will not, according to his staff… Butterfield spokesman Ken Willis, meanwhile, said the most recent $1,000 contribution from Rangel to Butterfield came last March, “well before the congressman even considered being on the ethics committee.” “There is no way that the contribution made so long ago will have any effect on his decision making,” Willis said. Butterfield also received a total of $3,000 from Rangel’s leadership PAC in 2004.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.