Why government health guidance on alcohol is, and always will be, incoherent 

Published



Dr. Mehmet Oz — one of the few members of President Donald Trump’s second administration who might once have rivaled him for network television fame — played to that very strength in early January while introducing the Department of Health and Human Services’s new alcohol consumption guidelines. Defending the Trump administration’s decision to ditch long-standing advice that drinkers limit themselves to two tipples per day for men and one for women, Oz offered reporters a pithy sound bite by way of personal advice: “Don’t have it for breakfast.”

While the official report sounds a note of caution, in his remarks, Oz offered an unexpected, garbled defense of drinking in the face of trends toward sobriety (just 54% of Americans reported drinking at all in the most recent polling from Gallup, the lowest rate recorded since its polling began in 1939). “Alcohol is a social lubricant that brings people together,” he said, adding that while “in the best-case scenario, I don’t think you should drink alcohol,” it provides “an excuse to bond and socialize, and there’s probably nothing healthier than having a good time with friends in a safe way.” Subtext: Amid mounting concern over Americans’ psychological isolation — the death of civic life, declining marriage and birth rates, the anecdotal but undeniable growth of antisocial public behavior — alcohol has some role to play in encouraging conviviality.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.