In Focus delivers deeper coverage of the political, cultural, and ideological issues shaping America. Published daily by senior writers and experts, these in-depth pieces go beyond the headlines to give readers the full picture. You can find our full list of In Focus pieces here.
It was the best hockey game in a generation. And America won.
Team USA’s 2–1 overtime victory over Canada will live in highlight reels for decades. The final goal. The saves. The anthem rising beneath a field of flags. For the first time since 1980, American men stood atop Olympic hockey.
But the defining image of the night was not the goal. It was what happened after.
As celebration erupted, the players carried Johnny Gaudreau’s No. 13 jersey onto the ice. Gaudreau, the gifted American star who died tragically in 2024 alongside his brother after being struck by an SUV while cycling, was supposed to be part of this Olympic run. His jersey had hung in the locker room throughout the tournament. Teammates spoke of feeling him with them.
And then they brought his children, Noa and Johnny Jr., into the center of the celebration.
Skates scraped as grown men slowed to match small, uncertain steps. Helmets came off. The American flag brushed against the ice. Victory paused for memory.
The players bent down to speak at eye level. They knelt; that posture is what matters.
In a country that cannot seem to speak coherently about masculinity, that image offered something rare: disciplined strength in service of the next generation.
The national conversation about manhood has grown both loud and shallow. On one side is a reflexive suspicion of male strength itself, as though competitiveness, physical power, and leadership are liabilities to be softened or restrained. On the other is an algorithm-driven caricature: masculinity reduced to dominance, grievance, and perpetual performance.
Young men are told contradictory things. Be assertive, but never threatening. Lead, but never impose. Compete, but do not intimidate. Show emotion, but never lose control. The result is confusion. Masculinity becomes either spectacle or apology.
Neither sustains a republic.
A self-governing nation depends on men who understand that strength is not self-justifying. It must be ordered toward something. Power carries obligation. Achievement binds you more tightly to those who depend on you.
Hockey, at its highest level, is not gentle. It is punishing and fast. Players absorb crushing hits. They block shots with their bodies. They subordinate individual glory to team structure. They endure years of conditioning for moments measured in seconds. Olympic competition magnifies every mistake.
To reach that ice is to embody discipline.
But in victory, these men did not center themselves. They centered children who had lost a father. They folded grief into joy. They made space for absence inside triumph. That was not sentimental. It was formative.
Across the country, boys were watching. So were fathers. I watched it not as a sports commentator but as a parent trying to discern what examples my children are absorbing from the culture around them. Most of what young men encounter today is either theatrical bravado or anxious retreat. Rarely do they see strength displayed without swagger.
On that ice, they did. Strength is not the problem. Untethered strength is.
This is where the modern manosphere goes wrong. It promises young men clarity but offers them caricature. It confuses hierarchy with honor, volume with virtue, and provocation with courage. It teaches dominance without duty — and resentment without responsibility. The result is not stronger men but brittle ones, perpetually performing toughness because they have never been formed in obligation.
What unfolded on Olympic ice offered a different model: strength that does not need to shout because it knows what it is for.
For much of American history, institutions helped tether male strength to purpose. Churches, civic associations, athletic leagues, and fraternal organizations; these were not merely social outlets. They were formative spaces. They taught men that loyalty required sacrifice, that victory demanded humility, that belonging carried responsibility.
Those institutions have thinned. Civic participation has declined. Loneliness has risen. Young men are less likely to join, less likely to serve, and more likely to construct identity through digital performance.
When formation weakens, caricature rushes in. Team sports remain one of the last national institutions that still trains men in obligation. You block shots for the teammate beside you. You accept fewer minutes if it serves the line. You endure criticism. You show up for early practices. You learn that your strength exists for something beyond your ego.
And when one of your own falls, you carry his jersey, and you carry his children.
That image — elite athletes draped in the American flag lowering themselves so toddlers could stand at the center of triumph — was not merely tribute. It was civic instruction.
We often frame the crisis of men in economic or political terms: labor markets, education gaps, partisan divides. Beneath those lies a simpler civic question: What is strength for?
If it is for self-display, we cultivate volatility. If it is for dominance, we cultivate instability. If it is for apology, we cultivate drift.
But if it is for stewardship — protection, provision, continuity — we cultivate republican virtue.
A free society depends on men who understand that power carries obligation. That achievement binds you more tightly to the vulnerable. That loyalty extends beyond convenience and beyond applause. Self-government requires self-command.
That is what was visible on the ice.
As a father, I do not want my children raised in a culture that either mocks male strength or distorts it into noise. I want them to see men who know what their strength is for. Men who win without swagger. Men who lower themselves when it is time to lift others.
The Miracle on Ice became shorthand for national resolve. This moment may become shorthand for something equally essential: the quiet habits that sustain a republic — discipline, loyalty, humility, and the willingness to kneel when duty calls.
MAGA RIGHT SOURS ON THUNE OVER SAVE ACT FIGHT
The overtime goal will fade. The posture will not.
They did not posture. They did not dominate. They knelt. And if we raise more men who understand when to stand firm and when to kneel — who bind strength to service and victory to responsibility — we will not merely celebrate America. We will preserve it.
