Estimated Iranian economic damage from war approaches $150 billion

Published May 8, 2026 5:55pm ET | Updated May 8, 2026 5:55pm ET



An estimate put the total explicit economic damage to Iran as a result of the war and blockade at $144 billion, but the true figure is believed to be much higher.

Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a pro-Israel think tank, released the report on Friday, providing one of the first explicit damage assessments of Iran’s economy. FDD’s Center on Economic and Financial Power senior research analyst Daniel Swift and FDD’s CEFP senior director Elaine Dezenski gave a wide estimate of $50 billion to $300 billion, with $144 billion being the most likely middle estimate.

However, the model deliberately excluded uncertain or difficult-to-quantify factors, effectively underestimating the true economic damage to Iran, which is much higher. The model made its estimate based on hydrocarbon revenue losses and physical replacement costs.

Drawing on satellite imagery, U.S. Central Command battle damage reports, International Atomic Energy Commission assessments, reporting, and Iranian statements, Swift and Dezenski calculated the combined damage to military and strategic assets, economic infrastructure, and disruptions to the economy. Half of the total costs of direct damage were from nuclear facilities, missile and drone production infrastructure, air bases, naval vessels, and air defense systems. The other part of the model came from analysis of lost revenue from oil and gas industry disruptions and the prevention of oil exports.

The majority of damage came from the war itself. Swift told the Washington Examiner that two-thirds of the economic damage was from the war’s air campaign, while the remaining one-third was from the blockade.

Replacement costs for Iran, which make up the lion’s share of the cost estimates, differ due to supply chain difficulties and sanctions. Its prized F-14 Tomcats are irreplaceable, as only the United States ever produced them.

“Most military hardware has a use-life measured in decades, and rebuilding Iran’s nuclear program, missile production infrastructure, and naval fleet would require, not only substantial financial resources, but time, technical expertise, and supply chains that U.S. sanctions have already severely constrained,” the report said.

Swift said the model deliberately excluded unquantifiable factors for accuracy, but he noted that these make the true costs of the war much higher.

This included the cost of rebuilding its regional proxy network, human capital loss, astronomical wartime inflation, reconstruction financing, and many more factors that are likely valued in the hundreds of billions. Long-term foreign direct investment deterrence was a major unquantifiable cost.

“Who’s going to put money in rebuilding Iran if it’s still in an uncertain peace?” he said.

The blockade’s biggest impact is on Iran’s oil industry, a central part of its economy. Unable to export the current flows and running out of storage space, Iran will soon be forced to cut production, something that could cause long-term damage.

“The issue is, if they run out of storage capacity, they have to take less out of the wells, which could allow water seepage and permanent damage to production capacity,” Swift said, adding that this could happen as soon as this month.

Research fellow and Middle East expert Zineb Riboua at the Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East, Hudson Institute, stressed the impact of the Trump administration’s Operation Economic Fury on Iran’s economy, closing many of its desperately needed sanctions loopholes.

“What usually happened was that whenever there were sanctions, there would be huge loopholes, especially in the shadow banking that passes through the [United Arab Emirates], but also through China,” she said. “But Operation Economic Fury really put pressure on those two major loopholes, and also the Treasury seized some crypto wallets.”

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps would use these loopholes to buy more time during negotiations, but now, “the more they think they’re going to buy time, the more pressure comes at them.”

“So whether the economic crisis is already there and is collapsing, I think we’re already there,” Riboua said. “The economy was not doing well way before the operation, and now it’s way worse. They obviously do not show it, because it’s not in their mentality to do so, but it’s not looking good.”

Another major factor damaging the Iranian economy is the internet blackout, which has lasted over 70 days. While essential for Tehran’s suppression apparatus, it cripples Iranian trade and commerce.

Jon Alterman, Zbigniew Brzezinski chairman of global security and geostrategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, stressed the massive impact of the war and blockade on the Iranian economy but expressed skepticism about putting a number on the damage.

“The economy is so distorted in Iran, to start with, that the sort of normal economic numbers don’t give you as accurate an insight as it sounds like it does,” he told the Washington Examiner.

As an example, he pointed to how gasoline is “basically free,” but the Iranian rial is “the most worthless currency in the world.”

“I would say this war has profoundly affected every single corner of the Iranian economy,” Alterman said. “Every corner. There’s not a part of the Iranian economy that is not profoundly shaken by this war, but it’s also a totalitarian government with control over the media, control over the internet, and the clear willingness to kill dissenters. So how much are people aware? It’s operating according to a completely different set of rules.”

As for the main question of the day, how long Iran can hold out, Swift, Alterman, and Riboua were all hesitant to give an exact number. Several outlets reported that a CIA estimate put the time frame at three to four months, a figure the three believed plausible.

Alterman voiced caution against any schedule, noting that many revolutions are impossible to predict.

“Revolutions and uprisings aren’t about math,” Alterman said. “There’s math involved, but there’s no arithmetic tipping point.”

Alterman noted how the 1979 Islamic Revolution seemed to many analysts, including the CIA, to come out of nowhere.

“It was just a few random things breaking a certain way,” Alterman said. “And it’s not like you reached a tipping point. It’s just random stuff happening.

“I think the regime is under stress. They’ve lost a lot of experienced people,” he added. “Mojtaba Khamenei doesn’t have legitimacy and doesn’t have a wide base of support. … But whether it’s fatal or not depends on partly on the economy and partly on some random things that may or may not happen.”

IRAN FACES FINANCIAL DEATH BLOW BECAUSE OF WAR

Riboua was the most bullish on the economy collapsing sooner rather than later.

“I think that they can’t hold out for a very long time, because this is a systemic economic crisis, so every day it will just get worse,” she said, adding that Operation Economic Fury had stripped them of most of their usual coping mechanisms.