Nicholas Kristof’s selective skepticism

Published June 1, 2026 10:00am ET



Nicholas Kristof has a skepticism problem — he is least skeptical of the stories he most wants to be true.

His recent New York Times column on alleged sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees reads less like reporting than advocacy dressed in journalistic clothing. He leaned on circular sourcing: nongovernmental organizations citing each other, testimony filtered through the activist ecosystem of Hamas-governed Gaza, overlapping organizations presented as if their mutual referencing constituted independent corroboration. The piece appeared, pointedly, just before the release of an Israeli report documenting sexual violence committed by Hamas on Oct 7, 2023. The timing was not incidental. The goal was to manufacture moral equivalence between documented atrocities and allegations resting on contested sourcing.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.