For the first time in 13 years, the American Academy of Pediatrics has issued new guidance on recess, declaring what many parents and physicians have long understood intuitively: Recess is not a luxury or a reward. It is essential to children’s health and development.
The updated guidance, published in the journal Pediatrics, reflects growing evidence that children need breaks between concentrated learning periods not only for cognitive development, but also for physical health, stress regulation, and long-term well-being. In other words, children’s brains and bodies aren’t designed to sit still and absorb information for hours at a time without opportunities to move, play, and reset.
Recommended Stories
In its updated guidance, the AAP also specifically warns against withholding recess for academic or disciplinary reasons and emphasizes that children need consistent opportunities for movement throughout the school day.
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG’S WAR ON VAPING PUTS CRIMINALS OVER CONSUMERS
That guidance arrives at a critical moment. American children are now among the most sedentary generations in history. Per recent data, almost 80% of adolescents fail to meet recommended physical activity levels, while childhood rates of obesity, Type 2 diabetes, fatty liver disease, and other chronic illnesses continue to rise. At the same time, many schools have reduced or eliminated recess in favor of more classroom time, test preparation, and screen-based instruction.
The result is a dangerous contradiction: Just as childhood movement has become more important medically, it has become less protected institutionally.
This is why recess should no longer be treated merely as an education issue. It is a public health issue.
Over the last year, my organization, End Chronic Disease, has worked with lawmakers in states across the country and across the political spectrum to advance legislation in support of daily recess. The emerging national conversation is striking not because it is ideological, but because it isn’t.
Last month, Gov. Kevin Stitt (R-OK) signed a bill into law that will double the amount of time K-5 schools must provide students during the school day, from 20 to 40 minutes. In Utah, lawmakers passed a resolution encouraging healthy school activity and recess. In New Hampshire, legislators are advancing a bill that would extend recess protections through eighth grade and prohibit schools from withholding recess as punishment. In Arizona and Ohio, recess legislation remains active.
And in New York, lawmakers continue negotiating a bill encouraging up to 30 minutes of daily recess for elementary school students. The legislation previously included mandatory minimum language, but lawmakers ultimately softened the bill amid concerns from education stakeholders about implementation flexibility, instructional time, and local control. Still, lawmakers such as Assemblywoman Chantel Jackson of the South Bronx understand that the children facing the greatest barriers to safe outdoor play and daily physical activity are often those who need recess the most. And in a state where Medicaid spending continues to climb, including a proposed $6.4 billion increase in state expenditures this year, protecting recess represents a rare policy opportunity that is both budget-neutral in the short term and possibly cost-saving in the long term by addressing chronic disease upstream rather than downstream.
Even where efforts have stalled, momentum is building. Gov. Laura Kelly (D-KS) recently vetoed a recess and school fitness bill, arguing the State Board of Education was prepared to address the issue under its existing constitutional authority. That was an unfortunate outcome after my colleague spent days in Kansas witnessing firsthand the enthusiasm that lawmakers, educators, and families alike felt for this cost-neutral and possibly life-changing legislation.
Still, hope remains. The debate itself demonstrates how far this conversation has moved. A decade ago, few statehouses were discussing recess as a preventive health policy at all.
That is beginning to change as the science is becoming impossible to ignore.
Physical inactivity in childhood is strongly associated with insulin resistance, cardiovascular risk, obesity, and chronic inflammation — conditions that often persist into adulthood and drive long-term healthcare spending.
Unlike many public health interventions, recess does not require expensive new infrastructure, technology, or specialized personnel. It simply requires time, making it one of the simplest and most cost-effective opportunities for children to move more during the school day.
Of course, recess also improves concentration, classroom behavior, and emotional well-being. Those benefits matter enormously. But at a time when states are spending billions treating chronic disease downstream, policymakers should also recognize recess for what it fundamentally is: an evidence-based public health intervention.
STOP EXCLUDING TAIWAN FROM FULL WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION PARTICIPATION
At a time when chronic disease rates and healthcare costs continue to rise, the new pediatric guidance offers a useful reminder: Not every meaningful public health intervention needs to be complicated or emerge from a laboratory. Sometimes prevention can begin on a playground, with something as ordinary and as fun as giving children more time to move, play, and be kids.
Students have never needed scientific studies to understand the value of movement, play, and time outdoors. And while science is essential, perhaps there is also something worth learning from those childlike instincts.
Kelly McKenna is the CEO of End Chronic Disease.
