The New York Times reports:
I know it’s annoying when writers can get all high and haughty over other writers producing copy that’s fatally imprecise, but you’ll have to indulge me just this once. What, pray tell, does “involved” mean? Was he a customer? An investor? Could he have been (say it isn’t so) a worker? Or perhaps he was in management. I guess the smart money is on Spitzer’s “involvement” having been limited to being a customer. Nevertheless, a press conference is forthcoming that will presumably clear up my confusion. In the meantime, let’s take a stroll down Spitzer’s hypocrisy of yesteryear. The Times also reports:
UPDATE: In the Daily Kos comment thread on this scandal, one Kossack offers a theory as to who’s really to blame for this sorry situation–George W. Bush!