Obama’s Popularity Abroad Does Not Equal Gains for America

The New York Times reports:

As President Obama welcomes world leaders to the United States this week, he has gone a long way toward meeting his goal of restoring the country’s international standing. Foreign counterparts flock to meet with him, and polls show that people in many countries feel much better about the United States. But eight months after his inauguration, all that good will so far has translated into limited tangible policy benefits for Mr. Obama. As much as they may prefer to deal with Mr. Obama instead of his predecessor, George W. Bush, foreign leaders have not gone out of their way to give him what he has sought.

The Times then ticks off Obama’s lack of accomplishments in key areas:

European allies still refuse to send significantly more troops to Afghanistan. The Saudis basically ignored Mr. Obama’s request for concessions to Israel, while Israel rebuffed his demand to stop settlement expansion. North Korea defied him by testing a nuclear weapon. Japan elected a party less friendly to the United States. Cuba has done little to liberalize in response to modest relaxation of sanctions. India and China are resisting a climate change deal. And Russia rejected new sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program even as Mr. Obama heads into talks with Tehran.

Over and over again we’ve heard from the left about how that “cowboy” Bush tarnished America’s image to the point that it was hurting America’s interests. It is now dawning on some that perhaps other nations don’t do what we want them to do because, well, they don’t want to. As Steve Hayes documents this week, Obama has done everything in his power to “reset” our relations with Iran. Where has that gotten us? Thus far, that effort has gone nowhere. By the estimate of Obama’s own handpicked intelligence officials, and our military, Iran continues to sponsor attacks against Americans in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair has even told Congress that Iran gives “lethal” support to the Taliban. North Korea has tested a nuclear weapon, fired long-range missiles, and kidnapped two Americans journalists. Obama sends President Clinton over there to appease a bloody tyrant, and he and his surrogates ramble on about the importance of six-party talks. Yes, they are going to work – any day now. Obama capitulated to Russia on missile defense. Do you think the Russians will help us with tough sanctions intended to counter Iran’s nuclear program? Don’t bet on it. The New York Times account excerpted above says that Obama’s advisers are trumpeting the cooperation they’ve received from Pakistan. It is one of the few examples they provide. But the same Times account says that the Pakistani population’s opinion of America remains “largely unmoved.” So, if there was an increase in Pakistani cooperation since Obama came into office it had nothing to do with an improvement in America’s image. Moreover, it is doubtful that there has been much of an uptick in Pakistan’s cooperation. Obama’s policies thus far have been largely the same as Bush’s (e.g. Predator strikes in northern Pakistan).

Related Content