Obey: You Can Review Earmarks, But Can’t Do Anything About Them

We’ve chronicled before the Democratic retreat on promises to limit and fully disclose the lists of pork-barrel projects included in appropriations bills. Now House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey has clarified that even though pork-barrel projects won’t be added to bills until immediately before they are voted on, Members will be given ‘plenty of time’ to review them before a vote. If one or more of those projects is a particularly egregious waste of taxpayer money… well, too bad. Because you still won’t be able to eliminate them–or even get a vote on them:

Obey has been criticized for his plan to advance the fiscal 2008 appropriations bills through his committee and the House floor without earmarks. Obey said funding for these projects can be added later in conference with the Senate… “Members will be able to write this committee if they have any objection to an earmark the conference committee is putting in, and the sponsor of that earmark will have an opportunity to respond to any criticism,” Obey said today.

How will such criticisms be handled? Well, you can’t be too optimistic when you realize that you’re writing to a Chairman who has previously argued that an earmark isn’t an earmark if it’s put in the bill by him.

Related Content