Beat to the Punch

The web is buzzing with news this morning that the latest video of Osama bin Laden was possibly leaked by someone inside the U.S. intelligence community to the media. That leak reportedly led al Qaeda to shut down a hole in its Internet infrastructure, called “Obelisk,” thereby closing a fruitful window into the terror organization’s web activities. The New York Sun‘s Eli Lake and the Washington Post are both reporting on this unfortunate development this morning. Much of the attention thus far has focused on the damage done to our national security–and rightfully so. But there is potentially another twist to this. According to Lake’s account, the SITE Institute first provided the video and a transcript of it to the National Counterterrorism Center. Here is how Lake’s report explains it:

The head of the SITE Intelligence Group, an organization that monitors Jihadi Web sites and provides information to subscribers, Rita Katz, said she personally provided the video on September 7 to the deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Michael Leiter. Ms. Katz yesterday said, “We shared a copy of the transcript and the video with the U.S. government, to Michael Leiter, with the request specifically that it was important to keep the subject secret. Then the video was leaked out. An investigation into who downloaded the video from our server indicated that several computers with IP addresses were registered to government agencies.”

This means that a small, private firm got its hands on the latest missive from Osama bin Laden before the federal government did. Think about that. The U.S. Government spends billions of dollars each year tracking the al Qaeda threat. And yet, a comparatively small, independent, and private firm got their hands bin Laden’s latest message first. What does that say about the need for reform with the U.S. intelligence community? In the Washington Post‘s account, intelligence officials recognized that this aspect of the story may make them look bad:

While acknowledging that SITE had achieved success, the officials said U.S. agencies have their own sophisticated means of watching al-Qaeda on the Web. “We have individuals in the right places dealing with all these issues, across all 16 intelligence agencies,” said Ross Feinstein, spokesman for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. But privately, some intelligence officials called the incident regrettable, and one official said SITE had been “tremendously helpful” in ferreting out al-Qaeda secrets over time.

So, although he emphasized that the U.S. intelligence community is diligently doing the same type of work as SITE, the DNI’s spokesman did not refute that SITE had first brought this tape to their attention. And other anonymous spooks confirmed that SITE is “tremendously helpful” in exposing al Qaeda’s secrets. Therefore, it does appear that the tape was first uncovered by SITE. In Lake’s account, U.S. intelligence officials claim that no one in the intelligence community leaked the tape. So, thus far, the only material issue at dispute appears to be who leaked the tape and the SITE folks are convinced it was someone in the government. The bottom line so far then is: SITE beat the federal government to the punch in uncovering this latest bin Laden tape and while SITE managed to protect the source of the tape, the intelligence community allegedly did not. And as Rita Katz, SITE’s founder, told the Washington Post: “Techniques that took years to develop are now ineffective and worthless.”

Related Content