Reports of Obama’s Ending the War on Terror Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

Published February 18, 2009 7:11pm ET



A few days after Obama’s inauguration, the Washington Post‘s Dana Priest wrote that Obama effectively ended the war on terror–excuse me, Bush’s “war on terror”–by signing executive orders to close Gitmo and CIA prisons and limit interrogation methods.

President Obama yesterday eliminated the most controversial tools employed by his predecessor against terrorism suspects. With the stroke of his pen, he effectively declared an end to the “war on terror,” as President George W. Bush had defined it

Priest also informed readers that in the bad old days of Bush’s war on terror, “Front companies and fictitious people were used to hide a system of aircraft that carried terrorism suspects to ‘undisclosed locations’ and to third countries under a little-known practice called rendition.” But lo and behold, today the New York Times reports “Obama’s War on Terror May Resemble Bush’s in Some Areas“:

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.