In Focus delivers deeper coverage of the political, cultural, and ideological issues shaping America. Published daily by senior writers and experts, these in-depth pieces go beyond the headlines to give readers the full picture. You can find our full list of In Focus pieces here.
In a recent interview with No Lie podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen, former President Barack Obama claimed that conservatives do “the mean, angry, exclusive, us/them, divisive politics. That’s their home court. Our court is coming together.”
This is a jaw-dropping contention coming from a man who began his presidential aspirations accusing Americans who refused to embrace his brand of progressive politics of being “bitter” and clinging “to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them.”
Now, I’m not sure there’s a group of people in the country who exude more “antipathy to people who aren’t like them” than urban progressives. Virtually every poll taken on the issue finds Democrats are far less inclined to accept Republicans as friends or family members. This comes as no surprise to anyone who’s witnessed the screeching moralistic anger of the average leftist activist — a disposition popularized during the Obama era.
Obama’s entire scandal-ridden supercilious presidency was focused on coercing, browbeating, and, ultimately, slandering the bitter clingers. In the former president’s vernacular, “coming together” simply meant accepting Obama’s worldview as incontrovertible truth.
John Podhoretz once offered an astute observation about Obama’s rhetorical strawmen. When the president “says ‘we,’ he means ‘you,’ and when he means ‘you,’ he means people who aren’t as enlightened and thoughtful as he and his ideological compatriots are.”
It’s true that Obama was rarely explicitly rude or disparaging toward his opponents. The president let his lackies demean John McCain, Mitt Romney, and countless others. The former president and his supporters, however, made no room for good-faith disagreement. Anyone who disagreed with Obama was captured by irrational and often nefarious prejudices.
And one of the most grating habits in this regard was Obama’s turning every tragedy and political event into a sermon about our collective failings.
Obama, the only president to that point to belittle the notion of American exceptionalism, would go abroad and tell the world that the “future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” Slandering Christians in the United States, on the other hand, was no problem. The Obama administration spent years trying to destroy the Little Sisters of the Poor for their faith-based objections to paying for condoms. The Obama-era Democrats normalized the legal war on orthodox Christianity, meant to chill speech and compel progressive cultural supremacy, a cause that’s not abated to this day.
The inclusive Obama, who had hitched his career to Black Liberation theologians like Rev. Jeremiah Wright and flirted with the Nation of Islam (a picture of a smiling Obama meeting with black supremacist Louis Farrakhan was hidden during his presidency), was the first president to engage in anti-Jewish dual loyalty tropes against Americans who opposed his obsession with rewarding Iran with nuclear weapons. Before Obama, supporting the idea of a Jewish State was a bipartisan norm. Not anymore.
And when Islamists murdered Americans, as Omar Mateen did when he killed 49 people in a gay Orlando nightclub, Obama attacked those concerned about the rise of Islamism as small-minded bigots, popularizing the dumb neologism, “Islamophobia.”
The former president was also a serial norm killer.
Democrats broke virtually every Senate custom to unilaterally shove a wide-ranging national restructuring of the healthcare system through Congress. Anyone who argued at the time that Obamacare was merely a step toward a broader socializing of medicine was immediately smeared as a liar by the president’s Swiss Guard in the media, a racist by Democrats, and an accessory to murder by activists. Our process still hasn’t recovered. It probably never will.
It was Obama whose unprecedented disparagement of Supreme Court justices during a State of the Union address began the Left’s crusade to destroy that institution. The justices’ crime was upholding the First Amendment in the Citizens United case, stopping the federal government from banning political documentaries and books right before elections.
But perhaps worst of all, the first black president in history, Obama, did everything he could to roll back 40 years of progress on race relations.
There seemingly wasn’t a single “racial” incident anywhere in the country that Obama wouldn’t exacerbate and exploit for political purposes. It began with his contention that “Cambridge police acted stupidly” after local police arrested historian Henry Gates, who was seen breaking into his own house, and continued with the killing of Trayvon Martin in an altercation with a neighborhood watch volunteer. Obama implored 350 million Americans, none of whom had anything to do with the case, to do “soul-searching.”
“If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon,” Obama said. “Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago.” The implication, of course, was that young black man were being killed solely due to their color. Martin’s shooter, George Zimmerman, was found not guilty by a jury, and Obama’s Justice Department did not file civil rights charges.
Perhaps nothing tops Obama’s detestable speech at the funeral of five Dallas police officers, murdered by a racist anti-cop extremist at Black Lives Matter protest in 2016. “None of us are entirely innocent” when it comes to “racial discrimination,” the president noted, “and this includes our police departments.” Obama invoked the names of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, two black men who had been recently shot by police, not only creating a false equivalency but also basically rationalizing the anger of the shooter.
It’s worth remembering that neither of the investigations into Sterling and Castile had even been concluded at the time. In 2017, Obama’s Department of Justice didn’t charge the police in the killing of Sterling.
By 2016, Gallup found that 46% of Americans believed race relations had worsened during his presidency, compared to 29% who felt they improved. A 2016 New York Times poll found 69% of Americans described race relations as “generally bad.”
In the interview with Cohen, Obama — whose DOJ spied on and indicted journalists, whose CIA spied on Senators, who droned American citizens without any due process, who tried to coerce faith-based objectors into buying abortifacients, who abused his executive power in ways not seen since FDR, whose administration orchestrated a unhinged conspiracy theory to overturn an election — contends that we are seeing “behavior that we’ve seen in authoritarian countries and we’ve seen in dictatorships, but we have not seen in America.”
THE GREAT BRITISH HOMESCHOOLING CRACKDOWN
Obviously, Americans are divided because we have deep-seated, legitimate, and meaningful disagreements about the future. That’s why politics exists. The political “unity” that Democrats claimed to strive for only exists in dictatorships. The inability to accept this made Obama the most divisive president of the modern age. Which isn’t to say that subsequent presidents brought us together. Far, far from it. It’s to say that Obama changed the way presidents spoke about and to their constituents. It was Obama’s systematic subversion of norms that made Donald Trump possible.
We don’t need any more of his lectures.
