Richard Clarke Joins Gov. Mark Warner’s Content-Free Presidential Run?

The Sunday Times in Britain reports that the onetime counterterrorism czar and Kerry ’04 supporter, Richard Clarke, has been coaching former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner on national security affairs.

For his part, Warner has learnt not to question the decision to invade Iraq. As a former governor, rather than a senator like Clinton, he does not have to explain away any embarrassing votes for or against military intervention. At a time of war, one of Warner’s greatest areas of vulnerability is his lack of foreign policy and national security expertise. He is being coached by several former Clinton White House officials, including Richard Clarke, a former counter-terrorism adviser, and Ivo Daalder, an expert on Europe at the Washington-based Brookings Institution.

A couple of months ago, a senior Democratic strategist with ties to Sen. Kerry’s 2004 campaign told me that Hillary Clinton will easily raise $250-300 million for her primary run. He added that her biggest political threat isn’t Al Gore or John Kerry but Warner should he decide to tap his personal wealth. With his “moderate” appeal and business background, Warner would also be positioned to raise lots of campaign cash the traditional way. The Washington Post‘s E.J. Dionne and many others regularly tout Warner’s credentials as a popular, centrist Southern Democrat who governed a so-called Red state. As to foreign policy, though, Warner has been virtually content free. For example, on Iraq he won’t say how he would have voted on the war authorization had he been in Congress at the time. He won’t tell voters if he would have regretted his vote today had he supported the authorization back then. He won’t say whether he believes the president made the right decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power in March 2003 or whether he believes the President should have given UN inspectors more time. Guess he’s waiting to see how things look in Iraq a year or so from now. One New Hampshire Democrat, who recently heard a Warner campaign pitch, put it this way:

Some confessed to mild disappointment. “He was okay,” said one, who did not wish to be named. Another, Stuart West, said Warner was too right-wing. “He avoided gay marriage and women’s rights. And did he condemn the war? No.”

Stay tuned.

Related Content