MoveOn Wants Out of Afghanistan

In 2005, Karl Rove told an audience in New York that “In the wake of 9/11, conservatives believed it was time to unleash the might and power of the United States military against the Taliban; in the wake of 9/11 liberals believed it was time to submit a petition.” He went on, “I am not joking. Submitting a petition is precisely what MoveOn.org did. It was a petition imploring the powers that be to ‘use moderation and restraint in responding to the terrorist attacks against the United States.’ ” MoveOn called Rove a liar, but he wasn’t lying. As Byron York noted at the time, there was a petition and it did in fact call on the U.S. government to use any means other than military force:

We implore the powers that be to use, wherever possible, international judicial institutions and international human rights law to bring to justice those responsible for the attacks, rather than the instruments of war, violence or destruction. Furthermore, we assert that the government of a nation must be presumed separate and distinct from any terrorist group that may operate within its borders, and therefore cannot be held unduly accountable for the latter’s crimes. . .

So not terribly surprised at Greg Sargent’s report that MoveOn is asking its members to write the White House and “tell them we need a clear exit strategy-not tens of thousands more US troops stuck in a quagmire.” The email says “Pro-war advocates both inside and outside the admistration – including John McCain and Joe Lieberman – are calling for a big escalation,” but the group refrains from criticizing Obama for the big escalation he already approved earlier this year — wouldn’t want to let pacifist principles interfere with partisan loyalties. So what will be MoveOn’s ‘General Betray Us’ equivalent for General McChrystal?

Related Content