Hillary Clinton swamped President Trump with substance-free attack ads during the 2016 election, while Trump ran far fewer, but more substantial ads, according to a new study of political advertising in the election.
The findings run counter to the narrative put forward by many Democrats that Trump was responsible for lowering the national discourse during the race.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
See Options
Already a member? Log in
Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
