Clinton’s ads more negative, more personal than Trump’s, study finds

Published March 9, 2017 9:48pm ET



Hillary Clinton swamped President Trump with substance-free attack ads during the 2016 election, while Trump ran far fewer, but more substantial ads, according to a new study of political advertising in the election.

The findings run counter to the narrative put forward by many Democrats that Trump was responsible for lowering the national discourse during the race.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.