Dems Committed to Budget Busting

June will be a busy month in the House of Representatives as the focus shifts to passing the 12 appropriations bills that fund all discretionary programs. Congressional Quarterly reports that the House is prepared to spend $23 billion more than the president has requested–and has already exceeded the president’s requests on the first four bills by some $9 billion. OMB Director Rob Portman is promising that the president will veto any spending bills that exceed his budget requests. If that’s the case, the president could wind up meaning a number of vetoes:

White House budget director Rob Portman on May 31 said he would recommend that the president veto any bill that exceeds the administration’s budget request for that measure. That went a step further than a May 11 letter telling members of the House and Senate Budget committees that vetoes could be expected unless spending bills were on a “sustainable path” toward an aggregate amount of discretionary spending within the president’s overall request of $933 billion… “I make no apology for trying to invest in things that will make this country grow more over the long haul,” House Appropriations Chairman David R. Obey, D-Wis., said before the Memorial Day recess. Veto fights will probably occur in late summer or early fall, when the first appropriations bills are sent to the White House.

It’s hard to argue that domestic spending has been shortchanged under the Bush administration. According to the Congressional Budget Office, domestic discretionary spending–which includes all outlays except entitlement programs–increased by 57 percent from 2001 (the last Clinton budget) to 2006. The Heritage Foundation’s Brian Riedl reports that discretionary spending not related to defense and homeland security increased from $333 billion to $466 billion over the same time period. That’s an increase of 40 percent. Now the Democratic Congress promises an additional 9 percent increase for 2008 alone? And they call this a new era of ‘fiscal responsibility.’

Related Content