Despite flaws, journalists mostly defend Ferguson coverage

Published December 3, 2014 7:30pm ET



From the moment journalists first arrived in Ferguson, Mo., to report on the shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown by police officer Darren Wilson, criticism for those covering the issue has been constant.

But what was initially restricted mostly to social media and blogs has since spilled over into the mainstream, news pundits and reporters alike now questioning each other’s handling of the unrest in the small Missouri town.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.