A FEW WEEKS AGO I wrote about America’s need to remember the heroes of Flight 93. At the local level, a handful of places have made moves to memorialize Flight 93 and at the federal level, Rep. Jack Murtha is trying to create a national memorial, although when I spoke with his press secretary, he was vague about when, where, and in what form this might happen. The most interesting suggestions came from readers. Here are some of the best:
On September 17, 2001, I wrote a letter to President George W. Bush. By that date it had become apparent that the people on board United Flight 93 had done something extraordinary. In my letter to President Bush I nominated the Glicks, Burnetts, and Binghams of United Flight 93 for the highest civilian award that can be bestowed: The Presidential Medal of Freedom with Distinction.
Mark Zugelder
I have used the phrase “United 93 Militia” from the beginning.
John Howland
Since, by law, the men on board Flight 93 were members of the Armed Forces of the U.S. as members of the unorganized militia (10 U.S. Code section 311) I feel that in addition to whatever monument is erected that they be formally posthumously decorated with an appropriate citation. I suggest the Legion of Merit. Theodore Roosevelt
They were not civilians. They were the militia, in the tradition of Captain Parker’s company at Concord. When faced with an enemy intent on destroying their nation they organized, took up what few weapons were at hand, and counter-attacked. Though they knew their own lives were forfeit, they engaged and destroyed a better trained and equipped foe. They saved hundreds, perhaps thousands of their fellow countrymen. Like you, I believe the target was likely the Capitol building, the easiest target to see from the air, and the easiest to approach by flying down the mall.
The men on 93 didn’t wear uniforms, they didn’t get a paycheck or shop at the PX. They didn’t go through basic training. They didn’t swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. They just did it.
If any one of them had been inactive reserve, they’d have been awarded the Medal of Honor. As civilians, they’ve been awarded the Congressional Gold Medal. The CGM is America’s oldest medal, and was first awarded to George Washington. It is also our highest civilian medal, but in recent decades it’s become a life achievement award for celebrities like Bob Hope, John Wayne, and cartoonist Charles Shultz. Those people lived exemplary lives, but they died peacefully in their beds. We owe more to the heroes of 93. They died fighting for their country. They should receive military honors.
There is precedent for awarding the Medal of Honor to civilians. The only woman to receive the medal, Dr. Mary Edwards Walker, was a civilian surgeon with the Union army during the Civil War. That could be repeated with the passengers of 93, who struck the first blow for America in this new war. Better still, they could, with the consent of their families, be retroactively inducted into the military at such a rank as befits their age, skills, and education, effective Sept. 10 2001. Their families would thus be eligible for the survivor’s benefits that should go along with losing a loved one in service to our country, and they would be posthumously eligible for the honors that they deserve.
Today, naval vessels are named for congressmen that vote for appropriations. How much more appropriate it would be for the next amphibious assault ship to be named for Todd M. Beamer? The Medal of Honor is given to men who stay at their post, and continue to do their job though they’re mortally wounded. Shouldn’t the same honor be given to Mark Bingham, for taking up the fight with teeth and fingernails? We send men into battle with training, weapons, equipment, tradition, and billions of dollars in logistical support, and we honor them as warriors when they rise to the occasion.
Surely we should do the same for men who fought with nothing but their hearts and hands.
Richard Riley
I thought you should know that one community–Milford, CT–acted last November to permanently honor these great heroes. I really don’t know why (many) other communities in America haven’t done something similar. Anyway, I hope, better late than never, that the trend towards doing such will begin.
Jack Fowler, Alderman (R), First District, Milford, CT
Congress should re-open to the public the Mall-side plaza of the Capitol (the side they would have attacked from, following the river and lining up the Lincoln Memorial and Washington Monument, following the open green space of the Mall, any idiot can steer that), with a small, low to the ground memorial to the pilot, crew and passengers of Flight 93. Folks would stand in one of our sacred places and look at the amazing Westward view (where Reagan was inaugurated), under the dome that Lincoln insisted by completed during Civil War, looking down on Grant looking out at America. It wouldn’t be a memorial just to look at, it would be a memorial to be part of.
Paul Donnelly
In addition to these ideas, I’ve found a number of excellent sites dedicated to Flight 93. The first, flight93memorial.org, is run by Somerset County, and is the official site of the memorial fund. By going there you can make donations to the fund and monitor the project’s progress.
Another site, UnitedHeroes.com, has a list of signatures and messages left in memory of the passengers and crew. And finally, there’s my favorite, The Legacy of Flight 93, which serves as a clearinghouse for information on Flight 93 and is run by a man named Robert Young. Young has donated substantial time, money, and effort to this valuable site and in his own small way, I consider him something of a hero too.
Jonathan V. Last is online editor of The Weekly Standard.
