President George Bush’s proposed 2008 budget allocates $28.7 billion, a less than 1 percent increase from 2007 budget levels.
For several years, scientists have been raising the red flag, saying that a slow down in NIH funding will hurt progress across a wide range of research and development projects.
The
In the
Washington
The slow down in funding “has a profound affect. … It has a big impact because most of the NIH labs are here in
In 2000, NIH pumped $950 million into the
“For individual scientists, their chances of success of winning a grant have dropped from one in three to one in less than five,” said Kei Koizumi, director of the research and development budget and policy program at the American Association for the Advancement of Science. “Obviously there’s a lot more stress and anxiety around the scientific community.”
However, the NIH’s budget doubled between 1998 and 2003 and proponents of the slow down say the budget has simply leveled off to catch up with that rapid increase.
Either way, “it means much tougher competition to win NIH research grants,” Koizumi said. “NIH is so big. It really dominates the biomedical research field. It is hard to replace.”