The Select Committee on Benghazi is accusing Hillary Clinton of not turning over all her work-related emails. The committee says it will release the proof later today.
“The Select Committee on Benghazi today released emails it uncovered to and from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that should have been, but were not, turned over in response to committee requests. The emails came to light as part of a document request to Sidney Blumenthal, who was recently deposed by the committee after it was discovered nearly half of Secretary Clinton’s public record regarding Libya and Benghazi pertains to emails from Sidney Blumenthal,” reads a press release from the House committee.
Chairman Trey Gowdy requested the State Department provide the House their copies of these emails by the end of the day, if they have them.
“Once again the Benghazi Committee uncovers information that should already be part of the public record but was not made available to the American people or congressional investigators,” said Gowdy, R-S.C. “These emails should have been part of the public record when Secretary Clinton left office and at a bare minimum included when the State Department released Clinton’s self-selected records on Libya. For that reason, the committee has made the decision to release the latest set of Clinton’s public records unearthed by the committee.”
Gowdy pointed out the revelation of these new Clinton emails, some of which fall in the gaps of time previously identified by the committee, raises fresh questions about whether Clinton’s self-selected record is complete and State’s failure to ensure the public and Congress have a complete record of the former Secretary’s time in office. Gowdy also noted that had the committee not called Blumenthal, it is questionable whether the public would have gained access to this set of information.
“It is significant our top diplomat was directly receiving unvetted intelligence information, which may have come from sources with financial interests in Libya,” Gowdy said. “Nearly half of the entire public record of Secretary Clinton’s regarding Benghazi and Libya is either from Mr. Blumenthal or discussion about Mr. Blumenthal’s emails. This correspondence far and away dominates all other emails we have from Secretary Clinton regarding Benghazi and Libya. Given this fact, there was no question we would need to speak with him and assess the reliability of the information he was providing to the Secretary. Questions about what influence, if any, Mr. Blumenthal had on our US policy toward Libya can only be answered by Secretary Clinton and her State Department senior staff. It is clear from these emails Secretary Clinton encouraged Mr. Blumenthal to send them in some instances calling into question her previous characterization of them as ‘unsolicited.’”
“We established the fact Mr. Blumenthal did not author a single intelligence memo, but rather forwarded them on to the former Secretary. He did provide candid advice about political matters and assisted in messaging her belief that our policy in Libya was a glowing success.”
Gowdy went on to note the committee found the unvetted Libyan intelligence memos odd because State Department has its own intelligence bureau, in addition to the all-source intelligence analysis done by the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency.
Chairman Gowdy also announced that at this time the committee would honor its policy of not releasing transcripts from interviews to encourage full witness participation. He is scheduling a non-business meeting for Members to discuss the matter further in private.
“There are people who have appeared and will appear before the Select Committee who are not as politically connected as Mr. Blumenthal,” Gowdy said. “Those individuals deserve the confidence of knowing all committee transcripts will be treated the same without regard to the political connections of the witness.”
“Once again the Benghazi Committee uncovers information that should already be part of the public record but was not made available to the American people or congressional investigators,” said Gowdy, R-S.C. “These emails should have been part of the public record when Secretary Clinton left office and at a bare minimum included when the State Department released Clinton’s self-selected records on Libya. For that reason, the committee has made the decision to release the latest set of Clinton’s public records unearthed by the committee.”
Gowdy pointed out the revelation of these new Clinton emails, some of which fall in the gaps of time previously identified by the committee, raises fresh questions about whether Clinton’s self-selected record is complete and State’s failure to ensure the public and Congress have a complete record of the former Secretary’s time in office. Gowdy also noted that had the committee not called Blumenthal, it is questionable whether the public would have gained access to this set of information.
“It is significant our top diplomat was directly receiving unvetted intelligence information, which may have come from sources with financial interests in Libya,” Gowdy said. “Nearly half of the entire public record of Secretary Clinton’s regarding Benghazi and Libya is either from Mr. Blumenthal or discussion about Mr. Blumenthal’s emails. This correspondence far and away dominates all other emails we have from Secretary Clinton regarding Benghazi and Libya. Given this fact, there was no question we would need to speak with him and assess the reliability of the information he was providing to the Secretary. Questions about what influence, if any, Mr. Blumenthal had on our US policy toward Libya can only be answered by Secretary Clinton and her State Department senior staff. It is clear from these emails Secretary Clinton encouraged Mr. Blumenthal to send them in some instances calling into question her previous characterization of them as ‘unsolicited.’”
“We established the fact Mr. Blumenthal did not author a single intelligence memo, but rather forwarded them on to the former Secretary. He did provide candid advice about political matters and assisted in messaging her belief that our policy in Libya was a glowing success.”
Gowdy went on to note the committee found the unvetted Libyan intelligence memos odd because State Department has its own intelligence bureau, in addition to the all-source intelligence analysis done by the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency.
Chairman Gowdy also announced that at this time the committee would honor its policy of not releasing transcripts from interviews to encourage full witness participation. He is scheduling a non-business meeting for Members to discuss the matter further in private.
“There are people who have appeared and will appear before the Select Committee who are not as politically connected as Mr. Blumenthal,” Gowdy said. “Those individuals deserve the confidence of knowing all committee transcripts will be treated the same without regard to the political connections of the witness.”
