CAP Channels Fred Kagan

Just in time for Obama’s Afghanistan speech, a new report has been released on the war in Afghanistan:

The addition of 17,000 U.S. combat troops and military support personnel by summer 2009-bringing U.S. troops to 55,000, their highest level to date-may be sufficient to freeze the security situation in Afghanistan for a while, but it is surely not enough to turn the tide. The United States must fulfill the request of General David McKiernan, the commander of the allied International Security Assistance Force, for an additional 15,000 U.S. troops, bringing the number of U.S. forces to 70,000, or about half the level in Iraq. This increase must include troops for combat as well as mentor teams for the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police to fill critical gaps in the training effort. Together with the 32,000 coalition troops already there, this increase will bring international forces to about 100,000-a nearly 300 percent increase over the average force level for the period from 2002 to 2007. This force level will most probably need to be sustained in the short term to intermediate term as Afghanistan’s army and police forces become more capable and ready.

As Christian Brose says, “This is brought to you by none other than those war-mongering neo-cons from the Center for American Progress.” This report only confirms my suspicion that nobody takes progressives very seriously on foreign policy — not Obama, certainly not Clinton, and not even Podesta, who employs a good number of them. Podesta is obviously committed to implementing a progressive domestic policy, and he saw to it that some of the top people at CAP working on those issues ended up inside the administration (Melody Barnes comes to mind). But on foreign policy, the progressives have been completely shut out in favor of a realists with roots on the center-right. And now CAP is putting out documents calling for a huge increase in troop levels in Afghanistan and a long-term commitment to bringing democracy and stability to that country through force of arms. That’s a great idea, but it’s not progressive.

Related Content