Cut, don’t promote, high-speed rail

Published



Next week President Obama will send his fiscal year 2012 budget to Congress. One sign that he’s not serious about cutting the deficit is his plan to spend $53 billion over the next six years on high-speed rail, $8 billion in 2012. Speaking in Philadelphia on Wednesday, Vice President Biden declared, “As a long time Amtrak rider and advocate, I understand the need to invest in a modern rail system that will help connect communities, reduce congestion and create quality, skilled manufacturing jobs that cannot be outsourced.” But most Americans don’t use railroads, they use cars. High-speed rail is an expensive form of transportation that will reach only small segments of the country and that will not substitute for highways.

Developing a true, nationwide high-speed rail network would cost far more than $53 billion. Building high-speed lines — capable of speeds of 150 to 200 miles per hour — on newly laid track, as well as incremental improvements in existing rail infrastructure, could cost between $250 billion and $500 billion, perhaps more. Obama’s initial payment would be just the first drop in the bucket.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.