Lobbyist Cash Changes Democratic Ethics Debate

Yesterday it seemed House Democrats would punt on ethics reform. But today the wind is shifting. Apparently Dems have decided not to go home this Memorial Day weekend without something to show their constituents (besides a much-delayed Iraq bill favored by the president). A major problem in organizing the debate is the fact that Democrats are taking in too much lobbyist-arranged cash to want to limit it:

Steve Elmendorf, the principal lobbyist for Elmendorf Strategies, held a breakfast fundraiser for Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) on Feb. 8.

Elmendorf said he did not remember the fundraiser for Frank because he hosts so many events.

“I do fundraising breakfasts almost every week for someone,” he said. “Fifteen or 20 people show up and write their checks. There’s nothing unusual about it.”

When the House debates ethics legislation today, it will have to tackle “bundling”–whereby lobbyists like Elmendorf arrange contributions–separately:

The disclosure proposal will still get a vote today-but as a stand-alone measure. Assuming it passes, the plan is to add it back to the reform package in conference talks with the Senate. A reform bill Senators approved earlier this year included a more broadly drawn bundling provision.

In preparing for the vote, Democrats blocked Republican efforts to offer as many as 13 more amendments. (The committee report summarizes the amendments and the votes). Among the amendments rejected: * random audits of lobbyist disclosures, with criminal referrals for lawbreaking; * blocking convicted felons from registering as lobbyists, * prohibiting the use of federal funds for lobbying for earmarks; * establishing an independent, outside entity to investigate corruption by Members of Congress; and, * preventing diplomats and CIA chiefs from lobbying for certain foreign governments. These seem commonsensical. Why are House Dems blocking debate?

Related Content