Daily Blog Buzz: Trouble for Byrd

Are the Democrats seeking a scapegoat for the failures of this Congress? Bloggers are buzzing about a report in today’s Politico:

A group of Senate Democrats has begun quietly exploring ways to replace the venerable Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) as chairman of the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, believing he’s no longer physically up to the job, according to Democratic senators and leadership aides familiar with the discussions… [T]here is broad discontent among committee members over the way Byrd has run the panel this year and the resulting problems in completing work on the fiscal 2008 spending bills, leading some members to privately push for Byrd’s replacement as chairman… A Senate Democrat who serves on the Appropriations Committee complained that the panel “has had no chairman this year.” And another Democrat on the panel said Byrd “is no longer up to the job. It’s sad, but it’s true.” A third appropriations member said that both Byrd and the larger Democratic leadership are at fault for an appropriations “endgame” that has resulted in a series of spending and policy victories for President Bush and the Republicans.

Captain Ed says, “In the wake of a humiliating 2007, Democrats will want answers for their failures. Byrd makes a good starting point. Even in the best condition, the Senate’s close split would challenge an Appropriations chair.” Frank James at the Swamp adds, “This story is something like a cry for help from those Senate Democrats who would never come out publicly and say Byrd needs to be ousted from his chairmanship because he is harming Democratic efforts to present a strong front against the White House and congressional Republicans in present and future budget negotiations.” AJ Strata thinks this is a cruel move, since the Democrats relied on Byrd in the 2006 elections. More from Don Surber and Michelle Malkin, who has written on Byrd quite a bit in the past. This story is obviously still developing, but it seems the Democratic party will use ’em and lose ’em when it’s convenient. Unfortunately for them, the White House is still getting what it wants.

Related Content