The Case for Romney, Continued

At his New York Times blog, Ross Douthat “games out” a potential third-party presidential candidacy by Mitt Romney. Douthat considers situations where Romney would place in third behind Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, and in second place ahead of Trump but behind Clinton. Then there’s the possibility Romney could run and win:

What would this outlandish scenario look like? Call it Romney 42, Hillary 41, Trump 16, with an electoral college mess that I can’t even begin to forecast, and the House probably voting Romney into the White House in the end. And yes, dear reader, I said it was very unlikely. I just wouldn’t call it impossible; not with these candidates, not this year. But more realistically if Romney got in he would be running to beat Trump, with the chance of winning outright as a kind of elusive, secondary dream. And that’s presumably why he won’t do it, because even if he “won” (beat Trump, that is) he’d be a three-time presidential loser, which is a hard outcome to ask a proud man to sign up for … … except, except that he’d also be The Man Who Stopped Donald Trump.

Douthat notes the Daily Caller‘s Jamie Weinstein’s argument for Romney to launch a bid, calling it the 2012 GOP nominee’s opportunity to be “something more than a historical footnote, something more memorable.”

As Douthat and Weinstein both acknowledge, the ability for Romney to pull it off is exceedingly difficult. But has there ever been a presidential election where both major party candidates are “disliked” or “hated” by 60 percent of the country? Romney may find his long-shot bid for the White House would be easier than conventional wisdom suggests, as well as the duty of someone of his stature and character.

Related Content