The “International Community” Will Get You

North Korea threatens the United States of America. But we’re not worried, because President Obama warns the Norks via CBS that “the T’s are crossed and all the I’s are dotted in terms of what might happen.” Harry Smith briefly departs from drooling MSM slavishness to argue with him, albeit weakly, pointing out that “They’re still defiant.” The president assures us that having the entire U.N. Security Council “willing to impose tougher sanctions” is a powerful weapon, and there’s a

. . . unity in the international community that we haven’t seen in quite some time. And one of the things that we have been very clear about is that North Korea has a path towards rejoining the international community. And we hope they take that path. What we’re not going to do is to reward belligerence and provocation in the way that’s been done in the past.

What does he mean by not rewarding “belligerence and provocation in the way that’s been done in the past”? Is he criticizing the Bush administration for not having gone far enough with Pyongyang in the Six-Party Talks? What can he offer them that’s worse than that unconscionable appeasement? And why does he keep repeating the “sanctions of international unity” mantra, when the whole world knows what the Norks know about that? And what are those T’s and those I’s? Does he plan to wield them against Iran, too? Because while we’re “witnessing peaceful demonstrations, people expressing themselves, and I stand for that universal principle that people should have a voice in their own lives and their own destiny,” as he tells Pakistan’s Dawn Newspaper, Iran has begun war games in the gulf, including “long-distance flights of around 3,600 km (2,237 miles) along with aerial refuelling from tanker to fighter jet and from fighter jet to fighter jet.” Meanwhile, though unwilling to declare the Iranian election either fair or not fair (no international observers), he hopes “that the international community recognises that we need to stand behind peaceful protests and be opposed to violence or repression.”

But beyond the election, what’s clear is that the Iranian people are wanting to express themselves. And it is critical, as they seek justice and they seek an opportunity to express themselves, that that’s respected and not met with violence.

Respected? There’s blood running in the streets of Tehran. How long can he go on threatening what’s left of the axis of evil with the disapprobation of the “international community” –“the world is watching”– before he gets us bit??

Related Content