Eli Lake reports:
Why does the CIA want to hold terrorist suspects, and why is the Obama administration reviewing whether to issue the CIA waivers for interrogation techniques above and beyond those listed in the Army Field Manual? Because waterboarding and other harsh methods of interrogation may amount to torture — but they work. Or at least that’s the verdict from one CIA official who has actually seen those methods in action but for some reason is rarely quoted in this debate:
The left spent years attacking the Bush administration for what was deemed to be Orwellian doubletalk on the most controversial elements of the war on terror. Rather than talk about torture, the left said, the administration referred to “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Rather than talk about “mercenaries,” in the parlance of the left, the Bush administration created an army of private contractors. And rather than talk about what the left perceived as a paring back of civil liberties, the Bush White House pushed the Patriot Act. And on and on. Well, now apparently it’s the left’s turn. Check out this quote in Lake’s story from Ken Gude, the associate director of international rights and responsibilities at the Center for American Progress:
You got that? It’s a “temporary holding facility,” which in no way should be confused with a “prison,” where the CIA temporarily held people in the bad old days of the Bush administration. At least the right had no illusions about the practices it was defending.
