Walmart should have listened to it’s outside counsel

Published



Legal documents leaked to the New York Times recently indicate that lawyers advised Wal-Mart that they faced potential sex discrimination liability as early as 1993. While Wal-Mart calls these papers “flawed” and “stale,” as with all communication the question isn’t a matter of what the papers said, but how the recipient reacted.

Law firm Akin Gump informed company officials that Wal-Mart faced liability between $185M and $740M for sex discrimination suits in 1993 alone. Seventeen years later, lawyers on behalf of women bringing a class action discrimination suit against Wal-Mart hope to subpoena these warning documents as proof that Wal-Mart had notice that its gender practices are not well-received among employees.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.