Unions in Favor of Globalization

America’s labor unions have argued that globalization is a bad thing — that workers and consumers are the victims when companies go multinational. When unions do it however, it’s apparently a good thing:

The long-discussed merger between Pittsburgh’s United Steelworkers and Britain’s Unite, creating the first transatlantic “super” union, is being called an important step in labor’s global strategy, allowing workers to better negotiate with the sophisticated multinational corporations that employ them. The self-proclaimed counterforce to corporate globalization may soon target mergers with labor groups in the emerging economies of Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe. Together, the two unions already represent workers in the U.S., Canada, the Caribbean, Ireland and the United Kingdom, and are in talks to take on the Australian Workers Union… “There are really no American companies any longer,” said Wayne Ranick, USW spokesman. The big companies that we think of as being American, “all of them are multinational,” often with a presence overseas. “Right now, there is no countervailing force to global capital,” Mr. Ranick said.

How will union members feel knowing that their dues may be going to efforts abroad? With regard to political organizing, will this internationalization of the union allow workers in the U.K. to help choose the next president of the United States (or vice versa)? Further, there already exists a ‘countervailing force’ to global capital: consumers and the marketplace. Except where governments interfere, consumers have the power to determine which multinationals succeed or fail. If America’s labor leaders are looking for an example of how multinationals are brought down, they need only look to sectors like steel and cars in the U.S. If you can’t make a good product at a competitive price, you fail. Sometimes — as in the case of General Motors — you can fail simply because you’re saddled with bad labor deals.

Related Content