The Washington Post released a story this afternoon titled “Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show.”
The story reports that Rubio’s family left Cuba in 1956, before Castro took over in 1959. Rubio’s mother went back to Cuba in 1961 and then abandoned plans to remain in the country:
The Post claims that Rubio has “embellished” the account of his parents exile, but Miami Herald reporter Marc Caputo notes that the Post, in fact, has embellished its account of Rubio’s alleged embellishments. While Rubio’s official website inaccurately claims both of the Florida senator’s parents fled Cuba’s following Castro’s takeover, the Miami Herald notes the Post is sloppy with the facts:
However, the story doesn’t cite one speech where Rubio actually said that.
Furthermore, Rubio himself has said his parents came to the United States before Castro’s takeover when asked directly:
When asked pointedly: Was it before the revolution? Rubio said it was before the revolution.
Read more here.
Here’s Senator Rubio’s response to the Washington Post story:
“What’s important is that the essential facts of my family’s story are completely accurate. My parents are from Cuba. After arriving in the United States, they had always hoped to one day return to Cuba if things improved and traveled there several times. In 1961, my mother and older siblings did in fact return to Cuba while my father stayed behind wrapping up the family’s matters in the U.S. After just a few weeks living there, she fully realized the true nature of the direction Castro was taking Cuba and returned to the United States one month later, never to return.
“They were exiled from the home country they tried to return to because they did not want to live under communism. That is an undisputed fact and to suggest otherwise is outrageous.”