Good — no, excellent — news: Most Americans approve of Arizona’s new immigration law. And by wide margins. According to Pew, the overall number is 59 percent. The New York Times poll came in at 60 percent. According to the NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, that overall number is higher still: 64 percent.
These solid majorities show stirrings of a surprisingly resilient national survival instinct.
I say “surprisingly” because that instinct, which in some cases may be no more than a reflexive urge to hold the line, has been subject to decades of steady, acid corrosion in the “politically correct” re-education camps we know as our nation’s school systems. There, we are taught that borders are “divisive” and immigration laws are “discriminatory.”
In other words, it’s either “We are the world” or you are a racist. The moral blackmail that begins in kindergarten doesn’t stop.
But if we think past it for a minute — a quiet, reflective minute, away from our minders — the logical notion that borders necessarily divide (nations), and immigration laws necessarily discriminate (between citizen and noncitizen) is still likely to coalesce. And that’s excellent news.
Who knows? With Arizona as our shining state in a desert, the electorate might even come to realize that without borders and without immigration law, there is no nation and there is no citizenship, and that we had better beef up both, and fast.
No wonder our transnational elites and rowdy, open-border agitators are so unnerved by what’s going on in Arizona. And they make a lot of noise telling us so.
In fact, when I sat down to write the week’s column, I falsely assumed Arizona was getting hammered from all sides. The headlines focus our attention on boycotts — city and sports — while the president and his Mexican counterpart turned their recent visit into a hate-Arizona fest.
Arizona is really only getting it from one side. (As the Pew poll notes, even most Democrats favor essential provisions of the Arizona law, with almost half supporting the law itself.)
It’s just that it’s the side with mainstream media access and Washington political clout. It’s the same side that almost reached critical mass under George W. Bush, with his “comprehensive immigration reform” — shamnesty — plan, and it hasn’t leveled off under Barack Obama, now gunning for similar legislation.
“In North America, we are defined not by our border but by our bonds,” said the president of North America, I mean, the United States, in an appearance with Mexican President Felipe Calderon this week. We want “a border that will unite us instead of dividing us,” Calderon said in turn.
This was somewhat less imperialistic than Calderon’s 2007 line, “Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico,” but the gist is clear. Neither president wants a border, both want amnesty for millions of mainly Mexican illegal aliens, and Arizona makes them mad.
That’s because nothing could be worse for such “citizens of the world” than Arizona’s immigration law — except, maybe, Arizona’s other restorative new law, which, to further the principle that “public school pupils should be taught to treat and value each other as individuals and not be taught to resent or hate other races or classes of people,” now prohibits courses, for example, that “promote resentment toward a race or class of people,” or “advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.” (It will be almost amusing to watch leftists slam a law against teaching racial resentment and hatred as “racist.”)
The fact is, the Arizona Legislature is onto the multicultural masquerade — the non-Western grievance industry pretending to be “education.” The party’s over.
It all fits, really. The state that wants to protect American identity wants to ensure that all of its citizens, regardless of race or origin, have one.
Call it the Spirit of Arizona. And let’s hope it’s catching.
