The Bolger Email

The Washington Post reports that the Iraqi government has placed restrictions on U.S. forces that have “startled American commanders and raised concerns about the safety of their troops.” These restrictions include an end of joint patrols in Baghdad and an end to running resupply convoys during daylight hours. The Post obtains an email from Maj. Gen. Daniel P. Bolger, commander of the Baghdad division:

“Maybe something was ‘lost in translation,’ ” Bolger wrote. “We are not going to hide our support role in the city. I’m sorry the Iraqi politicians lied/dissembled/spun, but we are not invisible nor should we be.” He said U.S. troops intend to engage in combat operations in urban areas to avert or respond to threats, with or without help from the Iraqis. “This is a broad right and it demands that we patrol, raid and secure routes as necessary to keep our forces safe,” he wrote. “We’ll do that, preferably partnered.”… “Our [Iraqi] partners burn our fuel, drive roads cleared by our Engineers, live in bases built with our money, operate vehicles fixed with our parts, eat food paid for by our contracts, watch our [surveillance] video feeds, serve citizens with our [funds], and benefit from our air cover,” Bolger noted in the e-mail. A spokesman for Bolger would not say whether the U.S. military considers the Iraqi order on July 2 valid.

These kind of restrictions are not unlike the self-imposed caveats that have “neutered” some of our NATO allies in Afghanistan. Earlier this week, Arnaud de Borchgrave quoted Gen. John Craddock, the outgoing Supreme Allied Commander Europe, as saying that such caveats “increase the risk to every service member deployed in Afghanistan and bring increased risk to mission success.” Similar restrictions would almost certainly pose similar risks in Iraq — to the troops and the mission. President Obama must make sure that U.S.commanders have the authority to protect their own forces, and he campaigned on a promise to do just that — to maintain a “strike force” in Iraq that would, in his words, “remain as basic force protection, to engage in counter-terrorism, and to continue the training of Iraqi security forces.”

Related Content