Study criticizes city?s redevelopment, says practices have created ?two cities?

Published



A new study on Baltimore?s redevelopment history imagines what could have been.

Baltimore City?s long-standing “plan, control and subsidize” development practice might have resulted in Charles Center and the Inner Harbor, but the process forced city bureaucracy into almost every major development in Baltimore and led to the favoring of large-scale projects downtown over other areas of the city, according to “Baltimore?s Flawed Renaissance,” an Institute for Justice report released Monday.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.