For the past year, we’ve been inundated with news of radical Iraqi cleric Muqtada al Sadr’s power and influence. Last year, the American Spectator‘s George H. Wittman asked if Sadr was a kingmaker or a king. This spring, just days after the fighting in Basrah began, Time magazine’s Charles Crain wrote an article explaining how Muqtada al Sadr won in Basrah. Just before the fighting against the Mahdi Army began in lat March, Patrick Cockburn, The Independent‘s Middle East correspondent, lauded Sadr by saying the Shia “regard Muqtada as a sort of god.” Sadr plays “a very critical role” in Iraqi politics, Cockburn told us. He is “the biggest Shia leader with the most popular support. If there were elections tomorrow he would probably sweep Shia Baghdad and most of the south.” How quickly the narrative on Sadr has changed. Today, the Washington Post describes a weakened Sadr, with a near-toothless political movement, struggling to find its path after suffering a stinging defeat after the passage of the Status of Forces agreement between the United States and Iraq.