I‘m trolling through the comments at other blogs to see what other useful information we can dig up… Over at Ace of Spades, commenter PJ (#39) writes:
I think it’s interesting that many of our informed readers have more trouble with the Bradley story than anything else–perhaps because it is the most easily debunked element of the story given the milblog communities intimate knowledge of the vehicle. We also had our pal Stuart Koehl write in yesterday ( you can read his comment beneath the original post) to say that there is simply no way that a driver would be able to see a dog off to the right of the vehicle, and further, that the vehicle would not be able to pivot as the author, “Thomas”, describes. I also thought this comment reflected a pretty common reaction, again from ACE, comment #54:
Another common reaction, this one from a commenter at Op-For:
We keep hearing this, that an NCO or officer would at some point have intervened, to stop a PFC from wearing a skull around, to stop a soldier from driving over animals, to reprimand the soldiers for ridiculing a disfigured woman… WWS pal Dean Barnett continues to pound away at this, with another post this morning:
Seriously, go read the whole thing, and it sounds like Dean will be discussing this extensively on the Hugh Hewitt show tonight… Again, one reader said he’d been at FOB Falcon the last eleven months and had not seen this woman, another said he’d been there for six months but had left the base eight months ago. He also said he hadn’t seen this woman. So what we need is someone who can push that date back even further…anyone who served at FOB Falcon before summer 2006 and can provide information as to whether this woman was, in fact, at the base. More to follow…
