Ruling on Councilman Jim Graham triggers criticism of D.C. ethics board

Published



The opinion from the new D.C. Board of Ethics and Government Accountability was blistering: D.C. Councilman Jim Graham had “committed one or more violations of the District of Columbia code of conduct” when he tied his vote on the city’s lottery contract to a Metro development project.

But despite unanimously issuing a ruling that spent much of its 27 pages attacking Graham, the ethics board closed its investigation because of constitutional concerns that it could not punish Graham for his conduct.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.