Cruz ‘Absolutely’ Will Filibuster Obama Nominee

Texas senator Ted Cruz put his opposition to the president’s pending Supreme Court nominee in the starkest terms yet, saying he would filibuster any name the White House submitted.

“Absolutely. This should be a decision for the people,” Cruz said Sunday on ABC’s This Week. “We’ve got an election, and Democrats — I cannot wait to stand with Hillary Clinton or with Bernie Sanders, and take the case to the people. What vision of the Supreme Court do you want? Let the election decide. If the Democrats want to replace [Justice Antonin Scalia], they need to win the election.”

ABC Breaking News Latest News Videos

Cruz’s Senate counterpart and presidential rival Marco Rubio added that the chamber wouldn’t move on a Supreme Court pick, echoing the position of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

“[The president] can nominate someone, but the Senate’s not moving forward on it until after the election,” Rubio said on CBS’s Face the Nation.

“There’s been a precedent established over 80 years that in the last year — especially in the last 11 months — you do not have a lame duck president make a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. So we’re going to have an election in November. This vacancy’s going to be an issue in this election. The voters are going to get to weigh in.”

Rubio added that he would hold himself to a similar standard as president, and stressed that a Supreme Court appointment “is not a law you can reverse … a policy you can undo.”

View More: Live News More News Videos


Democrats have attacked Cruz, Rubio and their fellow Republicans for their stance on replacing Scalia, with Senator Chuck Schumer saying “show me the clause [in the Constitution] that says [the] president’s only president for three years.” Writing in THE WEEKLY STANDARD, the Hoover Institution’s Adam J. White highlights a separate piece of constitutional text:

True, Presidents serve four-year terms. But here’s a question for Senator Schumer: Can you show me the clause that says the Senate must vote on, let alone confirm, a President’s nominee? I’ll save him the effort: There is no such clause in the Constitution. Advertisement Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution provides that the president “shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint … judges of the Supreme Court.” It could not be simpler. The president nominates someone. If the Senate gives its advice and consent, then the president can appoint him. But nowhere does the Constitution say that the Senate is required to act on the president’s nominations. The Framers certainly didn’t understand the Senate to bear such an obligation. And the Framers who drafted that document certainly didn’t say that the Senate bore such an obligation.

Read it all here.

Related Content