‘This Obama judge’ is ‘outrageous’: Levin blasts ruling dismissing Trump voter fraud challenge

Levin went on to explain in a lengthy Twitter thread why he believes the case had merit and did not deserve to be thrown out.

“There was unquestionably a reasonable basis in fact and law to proceed, and to allow the Trump campaign’s lawyers to conduct immediate discovery,” Levin wrote. “This is a miscarriage of justice. And the judge’s opinion reads as if it was written for the media.”

Levin continued, “The problem the Trump campaign is facing now is the unwillingness of judges to actually do their jobs, certainly in this case, and certainly in the case of the U.S. Supreme Court, where the chief justice failed to do his job.”

Levin argued that Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution supported the president when it states “explicitly that the state legislatures, not judges or governors, make election laws” and added that he “hopes” the Trump team will appeal the decision.

“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens,” Brann wrote in his scathing dismissal. “That has not happened.”

The Trump legal team responded to the ruling saying it “turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

President Trump specifically responded to Levin’s tweet late Saturday night thanking the conservative pundit for his support.

“Thanks Mark,” Trump tweeted. “It’s all a continuation of the never ending Witch Hunt. Judge Brann, who would not even allow us to present our case or evidence, is a product of Senator Pat ‘No Tariffs’ Toomey of Pennsylvania, no friend of mine, & Obama – No wonder. 900,000 Fraudulent Votes!”