Listening to North Korea

Today’s featured op-ed in the Washington Post, “North Korea’s consistent message to the U.S.,” is by former President Jimmy Carter. In case you have forgotten, Carter has been to the DPRK in both official and unofficial capacities. He has a relationship with the regime and speculates that all the North Koreans want is a little respect:

[I]t is entirely possible that their recent revelation of their uranium enrichment centrifuges and Pyongyang’s shelling of a South Korean island Tuesday are designed to remind the world that they deserve respect in negotiations that will shape their future. Ultimately, the choice for the United States may be between diplomatic niceties and avoiding a catastrophic confrontation.

Except that it would still seem unclear whether or not that would bring an end to North Korea’s nuclear designs. Sure, the regime told this to Carter last summer:

This past July I was invited to return to Pyongyang to secure the release of an American, Aijalon Gomes, with the proviso that my visit would last long enough for substantive talks with top North Korean officials. They spelled out in detail their desire to develop a denuclearized Korean Peninsula and a permanent cease-fire, based on the 1994 agreements and the terms adopted by the six powers in September 2005. With no authority to mediate any disputes, I relayed this message to the State Department and White House. Chinese leaders indicated support of this bilateral discussion.

But is the DPRK known for saying what it really means? (A high-ranking German diplomat once told me that his encounters with North Korean officials in Berlin were the strangest he’s ever had. When he told a DPRK representative about Germany’s concerns, the man would simply take out a piece of paper and read whatever was on it—and it had nothing to do with what he just said. When he repeated his concerns, the North Korean simply took out another piece of paper and read whatever was on that.)

Also, when Carter relayed his findings to Obama administration officials, what was their reaction? “Sure, President Carter, thanks for letting us know. So you had a nice flight?” He doesn’t tell us.

The bottom line, according to the 39th president:

Pyongyang has sent a consistent message that during direct talks with the United States, it is ready to conclude an agreement to end its nuclear programs, put them all under IAEA inspection and conclude a permanent peace treaty to replace the “temporary” cease-fire of 1953. We should consider responding to this offer.

And if not?

The unfortunate alternative is for North Koreans to take whatever actions they consider necessary to defend themselves from what they claim to fear most: a military attack supported by the United States, along with efforts to change the political regime.

In short, the United States needs to listen. The DPRK is telling us what it wants. And the last thing we need to do is flex our muscles.

Is it just me, or do you get the impression that when Carter walks through the halls of power in Pyongyang, someone behind a curtain cues “Listen to the Flower People”?

Related Content