How Hotel Chains and Government Work Together to Thwart Airbnb

Sometimes you hear that thriving businesses are capitalist enterprises that relish competing and winning.

And then you read about the heavy-handed efforts of taxi companies to use government to punish innovative competitors such as Uber and Lyft. Or you learn how brick-and-mortar restaurants are working to drive off upstart food trucks with new government regulations. The gales of creative destruction from nimble competitors can be swift and unforgiving, and government often acts as a willing shield.

The latest example comes from today’s New York Times, which details how the hotel industry is working with all levels of government to strangle Airbnb, the website that connects people searching for short-term vacation rentals with willing owners. The country’s paper of record got its hands on some internal documents from the American Hotel and Lodging Association, which counts major hotel chains as members:

The main prongs of the association’s plan to constrain Airbnb include lobbying politicians and state attorneys general to reduce the number of Airbnb hosts, funding studies to show Airbnb is filled with people who are quietly running hotels out of residential buildings and highlighting how Airbnb hosts do not collect hotel taxes and are not subject to the same safety and security regulations that hotel operators must follow. … The trade group began to form alliances with politicians, affordable housing groups and neighborhood associations. The industry also forged relationships with hotel labor unions—which it typically faces off against on many issues—about dealing with Airbnb. In total, the association has a $5.6 million annual budget for regulatory work. In New York, the association began working with local affiliates to lobby state legislators and the governor’s office to adopt steeper fines for New York City hosts that list on Airbnb in violation of local law, a move that hotel operators had hoped would help increase their business. The association also sought help from politicians in Washington. In its documents, the group said it had worked with Senators Brian Schatz of Hawaii, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, and Dianne Feinstein of California. The three Democrats sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission in July “raising concerns about the short-term rental industry,” one of the hotel association documents said.

Ordinarily, it would be amusing to watch those self-styled consumer advocate senators explain why they choose to join arms with multibillion-dollar hotel chains to crush lower-cost competition. (None replied to the Times.) Except that in this case, anti-Airbnb ordinances from the alliance between government and big business are costing real people real money. Unsurprisingly, a study last year found that “Airbnb properties have started to pressure hotels to keep rates low in a handful of cities where home-sharing units are plentiful,” according to the Los Angeles Times.

Cities with the toughest regulations against short-term housing rentals also happen to be places with some of the most expensive hotel rooms, including New York, San Francisco, and Santa Monica, Calif. New York City issued its first fines against “illegal listings” in February.

An Airbnb spokesman told the Times that “the hotel cartel is intent on short-sheeting the middle class so they can keep price-gouging consumers.” Sounds about right.

Related Content