Facebook’s free-speech dilemma is financial, not constitutional

Published May 15, 2018 4:01am ET



Facebook has no First Amendment obligation to treat conservative and liberal opinions equally.

There are, however, ethical and financial reasons for doing so that carry as much weight, if not more, than legal requirements. The Menlo Park, Calif.-based social media company’s response to a congressional hearing focused on discrimination complaints by two supporters of President Trump shows CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s keen awareness of both.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.