Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the National Security Council Ukraine director who said he was disturbed by President Trumpâs phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, testified in Tuesday morningâs Democratic-led impeachment hearing.
Vindman, who was criticized by some for wearing his military uniform for his closed-door testimony in late October, again appeared in full military uniform as he faced a packed room and an array of cameras alongside Vice President Mike Pence’s adviser Jennifer Williams.
Trump asked Zelensky “to do us a favor,â by looking into a CrowdStrike conspiracy theory during their July 25 phone call. He also urged Zelensky to investigate âthe other thing,â referring to allegations of corruption related to Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden stemming from the younger Bidenâs lucrative position on the board of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company, and the elder Biden advocating for the firing of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin.
âI was concerned by the call, what I heard was improper,â Vindman testified, adding, âIt is improper for the President of the United States to demand a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen and political opponent. It was also clear that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma, it would be interpreted as a partisan play. This would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing bipartisan support, undermine U.S. national security, and advance Russiaâs strategic objectives in the region.â
Vindman said he became concerned about U.S. policy toward Ukraine in the spring.
âI became aware of two disruptive actors â primarily Ukraineâs then-Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko and former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, President Trumpâs personal attorney â promoting false information that undermined the United Statesâ Ukraine policy,â Vindman testified. âThe NSC and its inter-agency partners, including the State Department, grew increasingly concerned about the impact that such information was having on our countryâs ability to achieve our national security objectives.â
Vindman then described a July 10 meeting in Washington, D.C., between Ukrainian national security adviser Oleksandr Danylyuk and national security adviser John Bolton, then-U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, Secretary of Energy Rick Perry, NSC Russia expert Dr. Fiona Hill, and himself, during which Sondland pushed Ukraine to carry out the investigations Trump would mention in his call two weeks later.
âAmbassador Bolton cut the meeting short when Ambassador Sondland started to speak about the requirement that Ukraine deliver specific investigations in order to secure the meeting with President Trump,â Vindman said. âFollowing this meeting, there was a short debriefing during which Ambassador Sondland emphasized the importance of Ukraine delivering the investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma. I stated to Ambassador Sondland that this was inappropriate and had nothing to do with national security. Dr. Hill also asserted his comments were improper.â
Vindman said he reported his concerns about the July 10 meeting and the July 25 call to the NSCâs lead counsel John Eisenberg.
There is speculation Vindman was the âshakenâ official mentioned in the Ukraine whistleblowerâs August complaint, who described Trumpâs controversial phone call with Ukraineâs president as âfrightening,â âcrazy,â and âcompletely lacking in substance related to national security.â
Vindman has said he doesnât know who the whistleblower is.
During his closed-door testimony, Vindman said he thought Trumpâs actions related to Ukraine had been improper, but Vindman also showed gaps in his Ukraine knowledge, including admitting, âI frankly don’t know a huge amountâ about Burisma â Ukraineâs second-largest energy company â and incorrectly believing Javelins were provided to Ukraine during the Obama administration, when it was actually the Trump administration which first provided the Ukrainians with offensive weaponry.
Timothy Morrison, a former deputy assistant to the president and the National Security Councilâs former senior director for Europe and Russia, testified on Oct. 31 behind closed doors that he and others on the National Security Council, including the NSC’s former senior director for Europe and Russia, Dr. Fiona Hill, had concerns about Vindmanâs judgment â and some on the NSC viewed him as a leaker.
Vindman finished his opening statement Tuesday by thanking his father for fleeing the USSR for the U.S.
âDad, my sitting here today, in the U.S. Capitol talking to our elected officials is proof that you made the right decision forty years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to the United States of America in search of a better life for our family,â Vindman said. âDo not worry, I will be fine for telling the truth.â