Only the US military could build a defensive wall of words – “dismounted complex blast injury” – around the bare fact that single, double, triple, even quadruple amputations are up sharply among US forces on foot patrol in Afghanistan.
So are associated pelvic, abdominal and genital injuries, as a newly released report on spiking “dismounted complex blast injuries” (DCBI) tells us. Even the antiseptic language of the report is excruciating, as when it calls for “further refinement” of “aggressive pain management at the POI (point of injury),” or highlights “the need to train more military urologists” in “phallic reconstruction surgery.”
It isn’t management but prevention that is called for. These grievous injuries have increased because more US forces are on foot patrol in Afghanistan. More Americans are on foot patrol in Afghanistan because counterinsurgency strategy puts them there.
Every story I’ve seen on the new amputation report makes this connection. The Associated Press account is typical: “The counterinsurgency tactic that is sending U.S. soldiers out on foot patrols among the Afghan people, rather than riding in armored vehicles, has contributed to a dramatic increase in arm and leg amputations, genital injuries and the loss of multiple limbs following blast injuries.”
But what exactly this counterinsurgency (COIN) tactic is designed to accomplish remains off the radar. The fact is, Uncle Sam is asking young Americans to risk limbs, urinary function and testicles by walking the IED-packed by-ways of Afghanistan to win – to “earn” – “the trust of the Afghan people,” a goal not only intangible but also fantastical.
Once we finally admit that the unicorn-hunters are wrong, once we stop trying to remake Afghanistan in something akin to our own image, once we start preventing Islam from remaking the West into a sharia-compliant zone (with counter-terrorism strikes, not foot patrols, as needed), these shattering body blasts to young Americans on the other side of the world will cease.
Meanwhile, “the trust of the Afghan people” is the holy grail of the Washington establishment, and, even after retiring from the military, Gen. David Petraeus, now director of the CIA, remains chief myth-maker.
“Earn the people’s trust,” Petraeus wrote in a signal “counterinsurgency guidance” issued on August 1, 2010. From his list of how-tos, which range from dispensing payola (“COIN-contracting”), to “help them develop checks and balances to prevent abuses” (good luck with that), to “drink lots of tea,” one order stands out, particularly in light of this week’s report on amputations resulting from foot patrols.
Petraeus wrote: “Walk. Stop by, don’t drive by. Patrol on foot whenever possible and engage the population.” His will be, and was, done. The amputation report reckons with the consequences.
Question: Is this COIN tactic, is this whole COIN strategy working? Is the burden of suffering the nation is placing on the military worth the return? When it comes to winning “the trust of the Afghan people,” is there any return?
These questions didn’t come up in the new report, naturally. Which isn’t to say the report was devoid of political consciousness. By way of background, the report defines “Dismounted Complex Blast Injury” as a new pattern of injury.
The definition is: “An injury caused by an explosion occurring to a Service Member while dismounted in a combat theater that results in amputation of at least one lower extremity at the knee or above, with either amputation or severe injury to the opposite lower limb, combined with pelvic, abdominal, or urogenital injury. This definition is not meant to define a subset of injuries for policy-making decisions.”
Oh yeah?
