In cases involving criminal procedure, we can often lose the forest of principle for the trees of legal technicality.

Courts have fashioned intricate (at times conflicting) rules regarding admission of evidence, witness testimony, and other procedural doctrines related to conducting trials. Yet, when done right, these procedures do much to realize the bigger principles we hold dear. We want justice done when crimes occur. We want the innocent protected and the guilty punished. In countries under despotism, we see these lofty goals asserted in theory and crushed in procedural practice.

Recommended Stories

Supreme Court decries institutionalized racism in Sixth Amendment case

Harvey Weinstein’s sexual assault conviction overturned by New York appeals court

Rachel Mitchell says Christine Blasey Ford’s accusation against Kavanaugh is even weaker than ‘he said, she said’