The Anne Arundel County Council is split over the economic impact of slots on the state.
Most agree, however, that whatever happens will likely be out of the council?s hands, no matter how it approves or disapproves of Gov. Martin O?Malley?s plans.
“As a local elected official, I do not know what his package is, nor has it been shown to me,” said Councilwoman Cathy Vitale, R-District 5, who has no position on the issue.
“I truly believe it?s something the council will not decide on. But a referendum does make sense.”
Councilman Josh Cohen, D-District 6, told The Examiner on Monday the referendum should ask whether people want slots in their community; he believes people would not agree to the measure because of the stigma associated with slots.
Proponents of slots say added gambling will bring in much-needed revenue to the state and help the horsing industry.
“I believe slots could generate revenue that would offset tax hikes and funding cuts,” said Councilman Daryl Jones, D-District 1.
“It would have to be highly regulated, but I haven?t seen any study that says slots bring an economic loss.”
Other disagree.
“Balancing the budget on gambling is a slippery slope,” said Councilman Ed Reilly, R-District 7.
“How can you predict reoccurring revenues on the backs on something as arbitrary as gambling? I?m against it personally and policy-wise.”
Councilman Jaime Benoit, D-District 4, represents Laurel Park horse track, one of the recommended places for slots.
He has said he opposes slots, and at the very least would not like to see them at Laurel Park because the road and water infrastructure is insufficient.
Council Chairman Ronald Dillon, R-District 3, said he agrees but would support slots if the area?s roads could handle the traffic.
